Is this an Americanism? In the UK, at least, these two terms are completely synonymous.
Typically, different words have been used because of different state laws. It's also somewhat of a marketting issue.
Don't ask me I don't make the rules. Shouldn't this be made explicit in the article? I've encountered a few people over the years who seemed to think hypnosis and hypnotherapy hypnosis chat essentially different things and this phrasing could foster that misconception. We'll be sure to stomp on it and change it once you've put all your hard work into it! I hope that it clears up the ambiguity for you Lindsay11 December UTC The piece that I inserted a couple of hours ago has been removed by an unregistered user As well, it is also necessary to clarify the issues that have been raised raised hypnosis chat HypnoSynthesis.
Lindsay11 December UTC Clinical applications The section about clinical applications seems a little sparse.
Hypnosis Chat Group
Research has demonstrated that hypnosis on its own can play a role in changing quality of life, for example in patients receiving painful medical treatments e. When hypnosis is coupled with other forms of intervention, for example CBT e. They describe how hypnotic techniques reduced both physical and psychological symptoms. Simon and Canonico vhat hypnosis in reducing distress in a patient hypnoeis dementia who hypnosis chat also needle phobic.
Welden and Yesavage - further support for the use of hypnotic techniques with a dementing population. We hypnosis chat want to throw in a few older references as well Excellent edit, DrMattGomes!
I wanting horney contacts
Hypbosis hypnosis chat as I am concerned the 2 versions header can be removed. I would do that, and make a few minor hypnosis chat, but as a gesture of good faith I will refrain for the nonce. Is there any way we can prune some of this down? I must admit, I dont find all the proceedings to be very constructive. For hypnossi, the intro does not anymore contain an actual intro to hypnosis. It should answer one core question: "what is hypnosis? Secondly, archiving thre from only a few days ago is a bit rude; Antaeus and I were in some kind of a discussion.
Thirdly, inserting headings into an article without content, only hypnosis chat to one single source does not constitute a very balanced article. For casual readers, it just looks plain silly. Either insert actual content, or dont insert a heading. I have marked them as stubs for the time being.
Fourthly, and not lastly, I think its a hypnosis chat, very bad idea to just go ahead and do edits which are so clearly controversial. I bypnosis spent some time and energy on the talk to forge hypnois kind of consensus, and out of that emerged a reasonably balanced to-do list. Obviously, all these edits barring the one by RDF has totally ignored hypnosis chat attempts. I cant be bothered to start an edit war, so I will suffice with this post instead.
The fact that the editing on this controversial has bypassed any attempt on consensus is very bad form. I archived the discussion because I felt hypnosis chat was better to get a fresh start, and leave what appeared to me irreconcilable differences of opinion off the table. If you disagree, you may cut and paste from the archive onto thisand I will not revert you. Answering "what is hypnosis" is exactly what the article does now, explaining "The definitions of hypnosis are as varied as the definers".
As far as the section headers, thats a common practice for building an article, and is a step towards getting a job done, not an acceptable final state. The point is that work is finially being done now, all thanks to DrMattGomes. This brings me to your hypnosis chat, and most important point, with which I profoundly disagree, in the strongest possible sense.
I believe I have been clear about this from the first to the last.
We are here to write encyclopedia articles. If talk discussion facilitates that, so be it. On thisit largely has not. The reasons for that are obvious to me, but I will refrain from stating them. I will however say what I have cha said, that the article badly needs rewritten by a knowledgable party. If that can't hypnossis me and I am willing to step back so long as others are allowed to do the needed workhypnosis chat must be someone. Thankfully DrMattGomes hypnosis chat begun some rather excellent and amiable contributions, and I intend to do what is necessary to see that they continue.
I agree with Sam around the "What is hypnosis?
Can i get hypnotherapy on the nhs?
I don't see how we can put that in the introduction since noone really knows what hypnosis hypnosis chat is. I tried to introduce it the best way I hypnoxis how at the time. The details about hypnosis will hypnosis chat found in the main body of the article. An introduction hypnnosis supposed to summarize what will be told further in the body. Perhaps we should eliminate the introduction altogether until the article is mostly completed.
I try to stay with facts as found in the research and, if there are different "facts" found such as with the different theoriesinclude the main ones such that the reader can make an informed judgement.
Hypnosis chat rooms
I had to use my own jypnosis to select the more "mainstream" or "popular" ones. I have never heard hypnosis chat the theory of hypnosis as a "social construct", so I left it there until we can do more research around it. I also inserted a heading for my favorite theory on "what is hypnosis" the "physiological" entry and will enter information when I can.
I find this theory to be more "palatable" to the general public. Thank you Sam for putting in the "stubs". I didn't know whether it was appropriate to enter place-holders until I could put the content in. Cchat is also a large reason for me not to intervene - it just might turn out pretty hypnosia. But still, starting with "Hypnosis has been practiced for thousands of years and continues to be controversial" is not answering the question "what is hypnosis?
I agree nobody knows what hypnosis is; this was debated extensively before DrMattGomes arrived. It is also listed in the to-do list, so why you should deviate from it is beyond me. But also the content, in my opinion, was just a lot better. Certainly, it didnt cover self-hypnosis, but why not just add a sentence on self-hypnosis, rather than removing the entire intro?
The first paragraph should attempt to give an overview of what hypnosis is - as good as is humanly possible. The second paragraph can then deal with history, Egyptians and controversiality. And Sam, to be fair, you have to admit you are the main person which has boycotted the consensus procedure here by saying it was pointless to start with. This is a very unconstructive attitude. If you hadnt taken that stance, we might well have made more progress.
But so be hypnosis chat.
@HypnosisChatBooks - Channel statistics Hypnosis Chat Books. Telegram Analytics
For what its worth, I think DrMattGomes is doing a good job and hopefully something good will come out of it. And you're welcome for the stubs. There has never been more consensus than there is now, we're currently at an all time high in that regard, scroll down and have a look. The only person i see boycotting the consensus here presently is you. My attitude has always been constructive, and my focus has always been on improving the article, rather hypnosis chat allowing it to be dominated by obstructive users.
The fact that I was unwilling to engage overmuch in fruitless dialogue hypnosis chat had gone on for ages before you hypnpsis in no way diminishes my joyful participation in discussion inclined towards article improvement. Mediation only works with two parties acting in good faith; Sam gives good faith lip service when he needs to and the finger when he doesn't. It's never going to be hypnosiz, but I've worked hard on improving it.
What happens in a hypnotherapy session
Hypnosis has been used to increase breast size. This is no more controversial than pain management or regression, etc. How about a bit of encouragement and support? After I read it six or eight times, it started to look familiar.
Then I remembered. I chaat that would be a better service to the reader than for us to attempt producing any one definition, which would be bound to be biased, original research, or more likely Hypnosis chat theory basically has its own definitions, so that APA definition section really looks out of place now. One definition per theory actually makes a lot of sense to me!
MY favorite definition of hypnosis I put in the theory section.
Hypnosis chat books
I don't particularly like the APA definition since it defines a proceedure and does not seem to take into self-hypnosis, but I'm unwilling to take it out just because I don't like it. DrMattGomes27 October UTC My thought is to give it its own section, along w your prefered theory and any others of substance. Sam Spade27 October UTC Among other things, a theory describes key principles and their relationships to help describe and predict circumstances and events.
Good definitions often do identify hypnosis chat elements of theories, but they can be at different levels of discourse. Xhat example, a general definition hypnosis chat "medicine" can be compatible with any of theories about diseases, their causes, prevention and treatment. Sam Spade27 October UTC Keeping definition separate from theory makes sense given the vast range of both within the field.
It makes sense of this hypnksis have prominence as it reflects the views of many.
If we can get some definitions from leading contemporary?